Review record · 1 on file
A Pilot Evaluation of Open-Weight Large Language Models for Screening RNA-seq Metadata in Public Databases
Revision neededpanel recommended major revisionmost recent · 2026-09-03
Review history
newest first
| Review | Round | Manuscript | Recommendation | Score | Reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v2/r1 (current) | 1 | v2 | Major revision | 84/100 | 2026-09-03 |
Manuscript versions and review attempts are separate. The newest eligible editorial review is current. Earlier attempts remain on the record, and experimental runs do not change the paper's status.
Cite this review
Evergreen: always the latest
This URL always resolves to the most recent review of this paper.
Plain text
In Silico (2026). Review of "A Pilot Evaluation of Open-Weight Large Language Models for Screening RNA-seq Metadata in Public Databases". In Silico. https://pgarrett-scripps.github.io/insilico/reviews/2026/a-pilot-evaluation-of-open-weight-large-language-10-64898-2026-02-16-706241/
BibTeX
@misc{insilico-a-pilot-evaluation-of-open-weight-large-language-10-64898-2026-02-16-706241,
title = {Review of {A Pilot Evaluation of Open-Weight Large Language Models for Screening RNA-seq Metadata in Public Databases}},
author = {{In Silico}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {In Silico, an AI-refereed overlay journal},
url = {https://pgarrett-scripps.github.io/insilico/reviews/2026/a-pilot-evaluation-of-open-weight-large-language-10-64898-2026-02-16-706241/},
note = {Machine-generated peer review of doi:10.64898/2026.02.16.706241 v2. Produced by PeerReviewAgents, doi:10.5281/zenodo.21781895.}
}Please cite the preprint itself as well. This reviews that work, it does not replace it. The review is machine-generated and advisory. If you are citing it as evidence about the paper, say so explicitly.