Review v4 · round 1 · manuscript v4
Rapid Histone Post-Translational Modification Analysis Using Alternative Proteases and Tandem Mass Tags
Panel readout
5 specialists · scored 1–5
Legacy scaled score
Range 4.0–5.0, a spread of 1.0.
- ethics5.0Confidence 4 of 5
- scientific validity4.0Confidence 4 of 5
- reporting reproducibility4.0Confidence 4 of 5
- data analysis4.0Confidence 4 of 5
- contribution context4.0Confidence 4 of 5
Score is the referee's assessment of the work.Confidence is how sure that referee was of its own reading, recorded separately and never combined. The editor's verdict is its own judgment of the reports, not a threshold applied to this mean. The legacy aggregate is the historical panel mean multiplied by 20. It is not comparable to the Editor-in-Chief's publication readiness score.
Abstract
as posted by the authors
Histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) alter chromatin dynamics and contribute to the regulation of gene expression in health and disease, yet mass spectrometry-based histone PTM analysis remains constrained by inefficient sample preparation workflows. Here, we develop RIPUP (Rapid Identification of histone PTMs in Underivatized Peptides), a streamlined multi-protease workflow that reduces sample preparation to hours while improving PTM coverage and quantitative accuracy. Systematic evaluation of Arg-C Ultra and a recombinant (r)-Chymotrypsin protease under varied conditions, including standard derivatization with propionic anhydride and tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling, demonstrated that Arg-C Ultra with TMT labeling achieves a detection of total PTM that exceeds Trypsin-based approaches. Using the HiP-Frag computational framework for unrestrictive PTM identification, we discovered that TMTs tertiary amine provides charge compensation that rescues the ionization of negatively charged acylations revealing 58 succinylation and 31 glutarylation sites - a dark epigenome largely undetected by propionylation-based methods. Complementary digestion with Arg-C Ultra and r-Chymotrypsin provides orthogonal sequence coverage, enabling detection of PTMs in H2A variants, linker histones, and regions poorly represented by arginine-specific cleavage alone. In HEK293T cells treated with the pan-sirtuin inhibitor nicotinamide, RIPUP quantified 112 statistically significant peptidoforms (adj p 200 PTMs including H3 K27/K36/K37 methylation, H4 N-terminal acetylation patterns, and H2A K118/K119 ubiquitination. This rapid, high-efficiency platform enables timely discovery of epigenetic mechanisms and accelerates the path from PTM identification to therapeutic target validation.
The review
- SummaryThe panel's assessment in brief.
- Decision letterThe editor's verdict and what it requires.
- Desk screenWhether the submission cleared the bar for full review.
- Advocate / skeptic debateThe case for and against, in full.
- Debate synthesisThe condensed account of the debate the editor read.
- Venue suggestionsWhere this might be submitted.
- Manuscript statisticsDeterministic counts over the text the panel read.
Specialist reports
Editorial audits
Factual checklists, not opinions. They skip the debate and go straight to the editor.
The text the panel read
counted, not judged
Counted at ingest, no model involved. These describe theconverted text the referees read, not your PDF.
Size
- Words
- 13,079
- Main text
- 10,198
- Sentences
- 603
- Display equations
- 0
excluding references
Sentences
- Median sentence
- 20 words
- Longest tenth
- 41 words
- Over 40 words
- 11%
- Passive
- ~0.3101/sentence
regex approximation
Evidence on the page
- Citations
- not countable
- Numbers
- 88.23
- p-values
- 0 exact, 6 threshold
this venue most likely sets them as superscript numerals, which convert to bare digits
per 1000 words
Hedging against amplifying
Per 1000 words. Softening ("may", "suggests") against strengthening ("clearly", "demonstrates"). No referee saw these.
Provenance
PeerReviewAgents 0.5.0 · 1cf57690
Reviewed file
v4 · 1554 KiB
sha256 654546f771196e2669addc38…
Debate rounds
2
Run cost
$2.12
Manuscript read as
markdown
Converted by rustypaper 0.2.0. Quotations match the manuscript text.
Desk screen
triage gate
Which model wrote which report
| Stage | Model |
|---|---|
| Editorial audits (×2) | claude-haiku-4-5 |
| Advocate / skeptic | claude-sonnet-5 |
| Specialist reviewers (×5) + desk screen | claude-haiku-4-5 |
| Editor, debate synthesizer | claude-opus-5 |
| debate synthesizer (override) | claude-sonnet-5 |
| journal recommender (override) | claude-haiku-4-5 |
The widest fan-out runs on the cheapest model. Only the agents that decide the verdict run on the most capable one.
What the referees looked up (13 searches)
| Agent | Search | Answered by | Hits |
|---|---|---|---|
| reviewer contribution context | find related workhistone post-translational modifications mass spectrometry proteomics | N/A | 10 |
| find related workArg-C Ultra protease histone digestion | N/A | 10 | |
| find related workTMT tandem mass tags histone PTM quantification | N/A | 10 | |
| find related workhistone succinylation glutarylation acidic acylations | N/A | 10 | |
| search preprintshistone PTM alternative proteases chymotrypsin | N/A | 2 | |
| search preprintsHiP-Frag histone modification search workflow | N/A | 0 | |
| find related workRyzhaya Arg-C Ultra histone preparation 2025 | N/A | 5 | |
| find related workVai HiP-Frag histone modification search 2025 | N/A | 5 | |
| find related workGarcia propionylation histone derivatization 2007 | N/A | 4 | |
| find related workcharge compensation ionization efficiency peptide fragmentation | N/A | 5 | |
| search biomedical literatureArg-C Ultra histone preparation LC-MS/MS 2025 | N/A | 5 | |
| search biomedical literatureHiP-Frag histone PTM unrestricted search 2025 | N/A | 0 | |
| search biomedical literatureTMT labeling histone analysis mass spectrometry | N/A | 5 |
Run against arXiv, Semantic Scholar, PubMed and bioRxiv while the review was being written. A search returning zero hits is kept: it is the evidence behind a referee saying it found no prior art.
What each agent cost
| Agent | USD |
|---|---|
| editor | $0.7387 |
| skeptic | $0.4533 |
| advocate | $0.4126 |
| reviewer contribution context | $0.1447 |
| audit citation integrity | $0.0981 |
| debate synthesizer | $0.0945 |
| desk screen | $0.0700 |
| audit methods completeness | $0.0326 |
| reviewer data analysis | $0.0197 |
| reviewer reporting reproducibility | $0.0182 |
| reviewer scientific validity | $0.0171 |
| journal recommender | $0.0169 |
| reviewer ethics | $0.0073 |
Cite this review
Permanent: this review only
This URL is a permanent link to this specific review, and will not change.
In Silico (2026). Review of "Rapid Histone Post-Translational Modification Analysis Using Alternative Proteases and Tandem Mass Tags". In Silico. https://pgarrett-scripps.github.io/insilico/reviews/2026/rapid-histone-post-translational-modification-10-64898-2026-02-13-705817/v4/
@misc{insilico-rapid-histone-post-translational-modification-10-64898-2026-02-13-705817-v4,
title = {Review of {Rapid Histone Post-Translational Modification Analysis Using Alternative Proteases and Tandem Mass Tags}},
author = {{In Silico}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {In Silico, an AI-refereed overlay journal},
url = {https://pgarrett-scripps.github.io/insilico/reviews/2026/rapid-histone-post-translational-modification-10-64898-2026-02-13-705817/v4/},
note = {Machine-generated peer review of doi:10.64898/2026.02.13.705817 v4. Produced by PeerReviewAgents 0.5.0. Produced by PeerReviewAgents, doi:10.5281/zenodo.21781895.}
}Please cite the preprint itself as well. This reviews that work, it does not replace it. The review is machine-generated and advisory. If you are citing it as evidence about the paper, say so explicitly.